Specific Purpose of the Regulation
The proposed regulatory action will ensure that the California Department of the Youth Authority (Department) is in compliance with the passage of Proposition 69 passed by the People of the State of California on November 2, 2004, which mandates that all wards and parolees under the jurisdiction of the Department, after having been convicted of, found guilty of, having pled no contest to, or having been found not guilty by reason of insanity, of any felony offense, or whose records indicate a prior conviction for such an offense, or any juvenile adjudicated under Section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code for committing any felony offense, shall provide biological specimens to the Department for submission to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for its deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and Forensic Identification Database and Data Bank Program .
Failure by the Department to obtain a DNA Specimen from offenders being paroled, discharged or even an escapee, could result in additional criminal behavior toward the public. Through the DNA gathering and submission to the DNA Databank, these crimes against the public could be prevented.
Collection and submission to the DNA Databank of the required DNA Specimens could exonerate current offenders. Additionally, it will further identify perpetrators of unsolved crimes and previously unidentified human remains could then be identified.
The specific purpose of each section is described as follows:
This section also identifies that failure by the ward or parolee to comply with the requirements of the DNA and the Forensic Identification Database and Data Bank Act of 1998, is punishable as a separate misdemeanor offense and shall also be subject to sanctions pursuant to the Disciplinary Decision-Making System. A ward or parolee's refusal to comply is considered a serious misconduct and is reportable to the Youth Authority Administrative Committee and Youth Authority Board.
As stated in Section 11349 (f) of the Government Code regarding "Non-duplication", the Department is proposing to make specific the DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime and Innocent Protection Act as well as SB 1242, Criminal Identification. The Department is duplicating because we believe we need to present the regulatory requirements in contacts with the statute as a coherent single explanation of what the law requires so that the people who will refer to the regulation to guide their conduct will know what is required of them when forcibly taking DNA Specimens.
The adoption of the proposed regulations is necessary to ensure that the Department be in compliance with the passage of Proposition 69, which mandates the collection of biological DNA specimens from all wards and parolees under the jurisdiction of the Department.
Technical, Theoretical, and/or Empirical Study, Reports or Documents
The Department did not rely upon any other technical, theoretical, or empirical studies, reports, or documents in proposing the adoption and amendment of these regulations.
Reasonable Alternatives to the Proposed Regulatory Action
The Department finds that no reasonable alternatives to the proposed regulatory action are necessary because the promulgation of regulations is required to implement, interpret, or make specific, statutes. This regulatory action is proposed to implement, interpret, or make specific Sections 295, 295.1, 296, 296.1, 298, 298.1 of the Penal Code.
Alternatives to the Proposed Regulatory Action That Would Lessen Any Adverse Economic Impact on Small Business
The Department finds that no alternatives to lessen any adverse economic impact on small business are necessary. The collection and submission of DNA specimens from wards under the care and custody of the Department have no effect on small businesses.
Impact on Businesses
The Department has made an initial determination that the adoption of the proposed regulations will not have a significant statewide adverse economic impact directly affecting businesses, including the ability of California businesses to compete with businesses in other states, because the proposed regulations ensures that the Department is in compliance with Proposition 69, and the collection of DNA specimens from wards or parolees under the care and jurisdiction of the Department and this has no affect on California businesses.